You want to show them that you’ve given careful consideration to each comment even if you’ve chosen not to modify the manuscript in response to a particular point. It’s not unusual for a contributor to Polar Research , the journal I edit, to be asked to revise her or his submission three or four times before it’s finally accepted. Submission Process Editorial decision-making: You’re looking to give wings to your academic career and publication journey. A journal’s editor may even want you to submit two versions of the revised manuscript: This content belongs to the Journal Submission Stage The journal submission stage can be challenging. These were on a variety of different topics, none of which had any relevance to our work that we could see.
Recent Searches Cover letter Responding to reviewer comments Predatory publishers Research objectives Grant proposal Open access Plagiarism in research Journal selection tips Abstract Difference between thesis and journal article “Reject and Resubmit” status Scope and limitations Citations. These were on a variety of different topics, none of which had any relevance to our work that we could see. A sentence along the lines of “All spelling and grammatical errors pointed out by the reviewers have been corrected” suffices. May whatever heritage you come from be the butt of the next round of ethnic jokes. If so, share it with your fellow researchers.
You can learn more about writing a cover letter and handling peer review comments in these posts: May whatever heritage you come from be the butt of the next round of ethnic jokes.
Indeed, we have mailed letter bombs to four or five people we suspected of being reviewer C, so if you send the manuscript back to them the review process could be unduly delayed. We hope that you will be pleased with this revision and will finally recognize how urgently deserving of publication this work is. A journal’s editor may even want you to submit two versions of the revised manuscript: After each comment state succinctly how you addressed the issue in the revision-what was changed and where.
Submission Process 10 Tips to write an effective cover letter for journal submission … Read. As for the cover letter itself, my own thoughts… Teixeira da Silva, J. If not, then lftter are an unscrupulous, depraved monster rssubmission no shred of human decency. It’s not unusual for a contributor to Polar Researchthe journal I edit, to be asked to revise her or his submission three or four lettter before it’s finally accepted.
One perplexing problem was dealing with suggestions by Reviewer B.
If you do accept it, however, we wish to thank you for your patience and wisdom throughout this process and to express our appreciation of your scholarly insights. Then copy each of the reviewers’ comments into your response letter. The only common thread was that all 16 were by the same author, presumably someone whom Reviewer B greatly admires and feels should be more widely cited. Hopefully we have suffered enough by now to satisfy even you and your bloodthirsty resumbission.
Tips for authors submitting a revised manuscript | Editage Insights
Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. The manuscript may still contain mistakes, but you’ve shown that you’ve done what you can to minimize them.
Assuming you accept this paper, we would also like to add manuzcript footnote acknowledging your help with this manuscript and to point out that we liked the paper much better the way we originally wrote it but you held the editorial shotgun to our heads and forced us to chop, reshuffle, restate, hedge, expand, shorten, and in general convert a meaty paper into stir-fried vegetables. If English is not your first language and you’ve engaged a professional to polish up the writing, state this.
Getting your work published in a peer-reviewed journal almost always involves revising your manuscript at least once.
A final word of advice: This content belongs to the Journal Submission Stage. Tips for authors submitting a revised manuscript.
Your email address will not be published. Second, compose a good response letter to accompany your revised manuscript.
Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage.
A sentence along the lines of “All spelling and grammatical errors pointed out by the reviewers have been corrected” suffices. This content belongs to the Journal Submission Stage The journal submission stage can be challenging. Journal of Educational and Social Research 5 2: If so, share it with your fellow researchers.
It’s not necessary to respond individually to each spelling or punctuation mistake, or similar trivial errors, that the reviewers or the editor indicated on the previous version of the paper.
It’s not a bad idea to start the letter by acknowledging the time and effort that the reviewers and possibly the editor have put into assessing the previous version of the manuscript. A remark like “We look forward to hearing from you in due time regarding our submission and to respond to any further questions and comments you may have” is a better way to wind up your letter.
If the decision letter doesn’t make this clear, go ahead and ask the editor via e-mail. Baumeister Dear Sir, Madame, or Other: I shall skip the usual point-by-point description of every single change we made in response to the critiques. You ought to be in a cage.