WHEAT FROM CHAFF META-ANALYSIS AS QUANTITATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW

Yet, we must learn empirically if economics is to advance. If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. MRA is used to assess the evidence for Ricardian equivalence, and its findings are contrasted to those of conventional narrative review. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the “citations” tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation. Download full text from publisher File URL: Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Barro, Robert J,

See general information about how to correct material in RePEc. Barro, Robert J, It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers. For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MRA offers a more objective statistical method to summarize our empirical knowledge and to explain the wide study-to-study variation in economic research. Meta-Analysis in Economics Statistics Access and download statistics Corrections All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors.

Wheat from Chaff: Meta-analysis as Quantitative Literature Review

MRA offers a more objective statistical method to summarize our empirical knowledge and to explain the wide study-to-study variation in economic research. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc. Seater, John J, MRA is used to assess the evidence for Ricardian equivalence, and its findings are contrasted liiterature those of conventional narrative review.

  TAGALOG ESSAY TUNGKOL SA TIMBANG IWASTO SA TAMANG NUTRISYON AT EHERSISYO

Is your work missing from RePEc?

Wheat from chaff : meta-analysis as quantitative literature review – EconBiz

Download full text from publisher File URL: Phillips, Joseph Mdta-analysis, This journal article can be ordered from https: If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item.

Stanley Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol.

wheat from chaff meta-analysis as quantitative literature review

MRA offers a more objective statistical method to summarize our empirical knowledge and to explain the wide study-to-study variation in economic research.

Search for items with the same title. Meta-analysis as Quantitative Literature Review.

RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers. MRA is used to assess the evidence for Ricardian equivalence, and meta-anxlysis findings are contrasted to those of conventional narrative review.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item’s handle: Yet, we must learn empirically if economics is to advance.

Meta-analysis as Quantitative Literature Review T. Here is how to contribute. Meta-Analysis in Economics Statistics Access and download statistics. Furthermore, MRA establishes a platform from which to distinguish genuine empirical effect from the exploitable specification error that infests applied econometrics. More about this item JEL classification: Meta-Analysis meta-anaoysis Economics Statistics Access and download statistics Corrections All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and whdat.

  HOMEWORK EXPO 2558

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

wheat from chaff meta-analysis as quantitative literature review

This paper presents and develops a quantitative method of literature reviewing and evaluating empirical research, meta-regression analysis or MRA.

Literwture, Robert J, If you are a registered author of this item, wwheat may also want to check the “citations” tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

A14 B41 search for similar items in EconPapers Date: General contact details of provider: Corrections All material on this site has been provided by literagure respective publishers and authors. If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form. You can help correct errors and omissions.

This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Help us Corrections Found an error or omission?