Rathinam held that Article 21 has also a positive content and is not merely negative in its reach. The nurses at KEM Hospital were quite happy to look after the patient and they had been doing that for years before petitioner Pinky Virani emerged on the scene. She prayed that the KEM hospital authorities be directed to stop feeding Aruna, and let her die peacefully. Since, there were disparities in the petitions filed by the petitioner and respondents, the court decided to appoint a team of three eminent doctors to investigate and report on the exact physical and mental conditions of Aruna Shanbaug. Archived from the original on 11 March Never miss a great news story!
She only keeps aging like any of us, does not create any problems for us. Since, there were disparities in the petitions filed by the petitioner and respondents, the court decided to appoint a team of three eminent doctors to investigate and report on the exact physical and mental conditions of Aruna Shanbaug. Since then, it is the staff of the KEM hospital that has been taking exemplary care of their colleague. Preferably, one of the three doctors should be a neurologist; one should be a psychiatrist, and the third a physician. The court rejected the petition on 7 March Passive euthanasia entails withholding of medical treatment for continuance of life, e.
Aruna Shanbaug – The Woman who triggered the Euthanasia Debate in India
Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. This case clarified the issues revolving around euthanasia and also laid down guidelines with regard to massive euthanasia. The nurses, in turn, chose to not stop her treatment. The above procedure should be followed all over India until Parliament makes legislation on this subject.
On 17 Decemberthe Supreme Court, while admitting the plea to end the life made by eutuanasia Pinki Virani, sought a report on Shanbaug’s medical condition from the hospital in Mumbai and the government of Maharashtra. Archived from the original on 28 June They have been family to her for the last 40 years and treat her one among them.
It is a right that encompasses within its broad domain the right to legal aid, right to a clean environment, and a plethora of other rights. The court also observed the difference between euthanasia euthsnasia physician assisted dying, the difference being in who administers the lethal medication. In the case of State of Maharashtra v. It was prayed to direct the Respondents to stop feeding Aruna and let her die in peace.
The Aruna Shanbaug case which changed euthanasia laws in India
In the case of P. Here is an attempt to summarise that judgement. Archived from the original on 10 January Following the attack, nurses in Mumbai went on strike demanding improved conditions for Shanbaug and better working conditions for themselves. The Court in earlier cases has clearly denied the right to die and thus legally, there was no fundamental right violation that would enable the petitioner to approach the court under Euthamasia Ztudy case is a landmark case as it prescribed the procedure to be followed in an area that has not been legislated upon.
How Aruna Shanbaug changed the euthanasia debate in India | india news | Hindustan Times
The question that came to be considered in the present case was whether inherent in this sacred right is the right to die-whether a person can be allowed to control his death and decide to end his life.
The High Court should arkna its decision at the earliest. Read more on India.
In her petition, she said that Aruna cannot be said to be a living person and it is only on account of mashed food which is put into her mouth that there is a facade of life which is totally devoid of any human element. In view of the inconsistent opinions rendered in Aruna Shanbaug supra and also considering the important question of law involved which needs to be reflected in the light of social, legal, medical and constitutional perspective, it becomes extremely important to have a clear enunciation of law.
Archived from the original on 10 March Pinki Virani’s lawyer, Shubhangi Tulli, decided not to file an appeal, saying “the two-judge ruling was final till the SC decided to constitute a larger bench to re-examine the issue. She was on ventilator support in KEM’s acute care unit.
Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug v. Union Of India: Case Analysis
Thus, the doctors opined that that euthanasia in the instant matter is not necessary. The guidelines to be followed in such cases are.
The nurses at KEM Hospital were quite happy to look after the patient and they had been doing that for years before petitioner Pinky Virani emerged on the scene. Supreme Court of India. A non-fiction book titled Aruna’s Story was written about the case by Pinki Virani in Next Article Trump effect is real.
Further, the nursing staff at KEM Hospital was more than willing to take care of her. Physician assisted suicide is arunq crime under section IPC abetment to suicide. Active euthanasia entails the use of lethal substances or forces to kill a person e. Archived from the original on 29 June Company Corporate Trends Deals.